Loopiest anti-gay screed ever

True, the competition is intense and formidable. But I must say that this 2002 letter by a reverend in Canada seems to set the bar at an impossible height.
Two years ago, Stephen Boisson’s letter in the Red Deer Advocate actually resulted in a $5,000 fine and the order that he pipe down after someone complained to the Alberta Human Rights Commision (decision). I can see an editor deciding not to publish this kind of crap. but as much as it exposes the reverend’s lunacy, I think it’s wrong to criminalize this sort of thing. Actually, idiots should not be discouraged from expressing these kinds of views, lest others forget that they’re idiots.
Boisson has posted the letter on his own Web site. Excerpts:

[T]his is aimed precisely at every individual that in any way supports the homosexual machine that has been mercilessly gaining ground in our society since the 1960s. I cannot pity you any longer and remain inactive. You have caused far too much damage.
The masses have dug in and continue to excuse their failure to stand against horrendous atrocities such as the aggressive propagation of homo- and bisexuality.
Like it or not, every professing heterosexual is have their future aggressively chopped at the roots.
From kindergarten class on, our children, your grandchildren are being strategically targeted, psychologically abused and brainwashed by homosexual and pro-homosexual educators.
Our children are being victimized by repugnant and premeditated strategies, aimed at desensitizing and eventually recruiting our young into their camps. Think about it, children as young as five and six years of age are being subjected to psychologically and physiologically damaging pro-homosexual literature and guidance in the public school system; all under the fraudulent guise of equal rights.

I really like that last part. Physiologcally damaging literature? What, are kids being clubbed with hardcover copies of Brokeback Mountain?
I’ve had my fill of irony for the day so I won’t comment on his complaint about kids being indoctrinated with dangerous ideas when they’re only five or six.

Regardless of what you hear, the militant homosexual agenda isn’t rooted in protecting homosexuals from “gay bashing.” The agenda is clearly about homosexual activists that include, teachers, politicians, lawyers, Supreme Court judges, and God forbid, even so-called ministers, who are all determined to gain complete equality in our nation and even worse, our world.

Yes, equality. The fucking nerve of these homos!
I’d like to see what this guy’s reaction would be to a rant demanding that Evangelical Christians, who really do have an agenda to infect as many people as possible with their “lifestyle,” stop being afforded equal treatment under the law. Not only outrage but calls for censorship and possibly prosecution would ensure–you can practically count on these morally outrages types to prove the biggest hypocrites on Earth.
Boisson links to a pamphlet, “Medical consequences of what homosexuals do,” on the Family Research Institute site, which isn’t one I think I’ve visited (it’s hard to tell because the names run together like so much gayhomosemen). It includes this “fact”:

FECAL SEX About 80% of gays (see Table) admit to licking and/or inserting their tongues into the anus of partners and thus ingesting medically significant amounts of feces. Those who eat or wallow in it are probably at even greater risk.

Wallowing in shit? Man, you folks really are sick!

Advertisements
  1. #1 by Tony P on March 13, 2009 - 11:38 pm

    I’m a gay man who is active in the marriage equality fight in my state. Cameron gets brought up, so too does a pediatrician by the name of Michelle Cretella of Westerly, RI.
    Then of course we have psychiatrist Dr. Dan Harrop, another of our foes.
    Thing is, Cameron got tossed from the APA some time ago for his batshit crazy views.

  2. #2 by wrpd on March 14, 2009 - 12:16 am

    I, for one, would love to have a homosexual machine. Do they come in different sizes.?
    About “fecal sex”: Doesn’t this really boil down to the lack of toilet paper and soap in the gay community? Perhaps we should start a fund.
    And obviously straight people never engage in “fecal sex”.

  3. #3 by wrpd on March 14, 2009 - 12:18 am

    Or maybe homosexual person have unnaturally long tongues?

  4. #4 by T. Bruce McNeely on March 14, 2009 - 3:48 am

    I haven’t heard of a homosexual machine yet, but there’s an old limerick that goes something like this:
    There was a young man from Eugene
    Who invented a fzzking machine
    Concave or convex
    It would suit any sex
    The god-damnedest thing ever seen.

  5. #5 by T. Bruce McNeely on March 14, 2009 - 3:48 am

    I haven’t heard of a homosexual machine yet, but there’s an old limerick that goes something like this:
    There was a young man from Eugene
    Who invented a fzzking machine
    Concave or convex
    It would suit any sex
    The god-damnedest thing ever seen.

  6. #6 by Buffy on March 14, 2009 - 8:45 am

    Anybody who cites Paul Cameron and/or his “Family Research Institute” automatically loses. Cameron is a discredited lunatic.

  7. #7 by ebohlman on March 14, 2009 - 12:09 pm

    Tony: Cameron was kicked out of the APA not for his views (though he’d like you to think it was for ideological reasons), but for his habit of misrepresenting his sources; if you actually look up his citations to the mainstream psychological literature, you’ll usually find that the source said the exact opposite of what he claimed it did (for example, he cites Nicholas Groth, an authority on sexual offenders, as claiming that a large percentage of child sexual abusers are gay; Groth’s actual work found the percentage was negligible, and Groth has had to threaten legal action against Cameron several times).

  8. #8 by SDC on March 14, 2009 - 10:19 pm

    ‘The homosexual machine’?
    Is he talking about C3PO?

  9. #9 by Warren on March 16, 2009 - 2:17 pm

    Those who eat or wallow in it are probably at even greater risk.

    It’s always amusing to me to see those kinds of comments from “straight” people. In their imaginings of what gays and bi’s get up to, they manage to expose their own deepest perversities with astonishing transparency.

  10. #10 by muhabbet on March 25, 2009 - 3:10 pm

    thanks..

%d bloggers like this: